Chapter 3

Definition of ocean forecasting systems: temporal and spatial scales solved by marine modeling systems


CHAPTER
COORDINATORS

Enrique Alvarez Fanjul
CHAPTER
AUTHORS

Marcos Garcia Sotillo and John Wilkin

3.4 The temporal scales: different applications of numerical modeling to solve ocean problems

The ocean displays variability of physical parameters across a very wide range of spatial and temporal scales, from minutes to centuries and millennia and from centimeters to the dimension of ocean basins (Benway et al., 2019). As shown in Figure 3.4, this feature makes the ocean a greatly complex system, characterized by interactions between a great deal of processes at many different time/space scales (in which small scales can affect large ones and vice versa).

Figure 3.4. Temporal and spatial scales of selected ocean processes.

Operational forecasting services, as defined in Section 3.1, typically deal with problems with a forecast horizon from hours to days, and time intervals at which the solutions are presented to users can vary from hours to minutes. Nevertheless, ocean models can be used for other purposes at longer time scales, such as seasonal prediction and climate modeling. Climate models are based on well-established physical principles, and it has been shown that they can reproduce observed features of recent climate and past climate changes.

There is considerable confidence that AOGCMs provide credible quantitative estimates of future climate change, particularly at large scales, although uncertainties still remain. As stated in the Randall et al. (2007) contribution to the Physical Science Basis Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC, there are different levels of skill in simulating the various ECVs.

Long-term climate change projections reflect how human activities and/or natural effects can alter the climate over decades and centuries. The principal driver of long-term warming is the large cumulative emission of CO2 over time from many anthropogenic sources. In this context, it is important defining scenarios, using specific time series of emissions, land use, atmospheric concentrations or radiative forcing across multiple models, which allows for coherent climate model intercomparisons and synthesis. As stated by Collins et al. (2013), for the above purpose is used information from a range of different modeling tools, from simple energy balance models to the highly complex Earth System dynamical climate models. The CMIP Phase 5 utilizes an unprecedented level of information on base projections, including the more complete representation of forcings, and has produced new RCP scenarios (i.e. RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6, and RCP8.5). Thanks to the coordination of model experiments and outputs by the CMIP5 group, the World Climate Research Program and its Working Group on Climate Models have been able to step up efforts to evaluate the ability of models to simulate past and current climate and to compare future climate change projections. This ‘multi-model’ approach is now a standard technique used by the climate science community to generate and assess projections of a specific climate variable.

Substantial progress has been made in understanding the climate scales, as well as in simulating important modes of climate variability; as a consequence, the overall confidence in the capacity of models to represent important climate processes has increased. These improvements in AOGCMs are due in large part to the continuous development of the oceanic model component in recent years. There have been improvements in terms of resolution, computational methods, and parametrizations; furthermore, additional new processes have been progressively added to the ocean models used to simulate multi-year periods and climate projections, enhancing the complexity of the ocean climate model component.

As previously mentioned, ocean model resolution has increased (currently, the state-of-the-art is eddy-resolving models) and ocean climate models, especially regional models, are abandoning the ‘rigid lid’ treatment of the ocean surface that filters out some high frequency processes. New physical numerical parametrizations, including true freshwater fluxes, and/or improved river and estuary mixing schemes, better advection and mixing schemes are now widely used. All these improvements have led to the reduction of the uncertainty associated with the use of less sophisticated parametrizations. Finally, it should be mentioned that there has been substantial progress in developing the cryospheric components of AOGCMs. Almost all state-of-the-art AOGCMs now include sea ice, with more elaborate sea ice dynamics, while many also include several sea ice thickness categories with relatively advanced thermodynamics and rheology.

Efforts to enhance the quality of climate projections are always related to the computational resources dedicated to the ocean modeling component, but currently there is no consensus on the optimal way to divide computer resources among the following components:

  • Finer numerical grids, which allow for better simulations;
  • Greater numbers of ensemble members, which allow for better statistical estimates of uncertainty;
  • Inclusion of a more complete set of processes (e.g. carbon feedbacks). 

Finally, it has to be mentioned that there is also an important ongoing activity in terms of ocean climate regionalization, which has been developed in the framework of national and regional climate services initiatives with special emphasis on coastal climate impacts and applications.

References

Benway, H., Lorenzoni, L., White, A., Fiedler, B., Levine, N., Nicholson, D., and DeGrandpre, M., Sosik, H., Church, M., O’Brien, T., Leinen, M., Weller, R., Karl, D., Henson, S., Letelier, R. (2019). Ocean Time Series Observations of Changing Marine Ecosystems: An Era of Integration, Synthesis, and Societal Applications. Frontiers in Marine Science, 6, 393, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00393

Capet, A., Fernández, V., She, J., Dabrowski, T., Umgiesser, G., Staneva, J., Mészáros, L., Campuzano, F., Ursella, L., Nolan, G., El Serafy, G. (2020). Operational Modeling Capacity in European Seas - An EuroGOOS Perspective and Recommendations for Improvement. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7, 129, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00129

Casulli, V. (2009). A high-resolution wetting and drying algorithm for free-surface hydrodynamics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 60(4), pp.391-408, https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.1896

Casulli, V., Zanolli, P. (2005). High resolution methods for multidimensional advection-diffusion problems in free surface hydrodynamics. Ocean Modelling, 10, 137-151, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2004.06.007

Copernicus Marine Service (2021a). EU Copernicus Marine Service, https://marine.copernicus.eu/

Copernicus Marine Service (2021b). Ocean State Report (OSR), https://marine.copernicus.eu/access-data/ocean-state-report

Copernicus Marine Service (2021c). Ocean Variables monitored by Copernicus Marine Service and Product Portfolio https://marine.copernicus.eu/access-data/ocean-monitoring-indicators

 Collins, M., Knutti, R., Arblaster, J., Dufresne, J.-L., Fichefet, T., Friedlingstein, P., Gao, X., Gutowski, W.J., Johns, T., Krinner, G., Shongwe, M., Tebaldi, C., Weaver, A.J., Wehner, M. (2013). Long-term Climate Change: Projections, Commitments and Irreversibility. In “Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]”. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. 

Dong, J., Fox-Kemper, B., Zhu, J., and Dong, C. (2021). Application of symmetric instability parameterization in the Coastal and Regional Ocean Community Model (CROCO). Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 13(3), https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002302

Fox-Kemper, B. (2018). Notions for the motions of the oceans. In “New Frontiers in Operational Oceanography”, Editors: E. P. Chassignet, A. Pascual, J. Tintoré, and J. Verron (Exeter: GODAE OceanView), 811, https://doi.org/10.17125/gov2018.ch02

Fringer, O.B., Dawson, C.N., He, R., Ralston, D.K. and Zhang, Y.J. (2019). The future of coastal and estuarine modeling: Findings from a workshop. Ocean Modelling, 143, 101458, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2019.101458

GCOS Global Climate Observing System. (2021). Essential Climate Variables https://gcos.wmo.int/en/essential-climate-variables

Giddings, S.N., Fong, D.A., Monismith, S.G., Chickadel, C.C., Edwards, K.A., Plant, W.J., Wang, B., Fringer, O.B., Horner-Devine, A.R., Jessup, A.T. (2012). Frontogenesis and frontal progression of a trapping-generated estuarine convergence front and its influence on mixing and stratification. Estuaries and Coasts, 35, 665-681, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-011-9453-z

Holt, J., Hyder, P., Ashworth, M., Harle, J., Hewitt, H. T., Liu, H., New, A. L., Pickles, S., Porter, A., Popova, E., Allen, J. I., Siddorn, J., and Wood, R. (2017). Prospects for improving the representation of coastal and shelf seas in global ocean models, Geoscientific Model Development, 10, 499-523, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-499-2017

Jacobs, G.A., D’Addezio, J.M., Bartels, B. and Spence, P.L. (2019). Constrained scales in ocean forecasting. Advances in Space Research, 68(2), 746-761, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2019.09.018

Kalra, T.S., Ganju, N.K., and Testa, J.M. (2020). Development of a submerged aquatic vegetation growth model in the Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere-Wave-Sediment Transport (COAWST v3.4) model. Geoscientific Model Development, 13(11), 5211-5228, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5211-2020

Kourafalou, V. H., De Mey, P., Staneva, J., Ayoub, N., Barth, A., Chao, Y., Cirano, M., Fiechter, J., Herzfeld, M., Kurapov, A., Moore, A. M., Oddo, P., Pullen, J., Van der Westhuysen, A., and Weisberg, R., (2015). Coastal Ocean Forecasting: science foundation and user benefits. Journal of Operational Oceanography, 8:sup1, s147-s167, https://doi.org/10.1080/1755876X.2015.1022348

Kurapov, A. L., Pelland, N. A., and Rudnick, D. L. (2017). Seasonal and interannual variability in alongslope oceanic properties off the US West Coast: Inferences from a high-resolution regional model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 122(7), 5237-5259, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC012721 

Legrand, S., Deleersnijder, E., Hanert, E., Legat, V. and Wolanski, E. (2006). High-resolution, unstructured meshes for hydrodynamic models of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 68(1-2), 36-46, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2005.08.017

Levin, J., Arango, H., Laughlin, B., Hunter, E., Wilkin, J., Moore, A. (2021), Observation Impacts on the Mid-Atlantic Bight Front and Cross-Shelf Transport in 4D-Var Ocean State Estimates, Part II – The Pioneer Array. Ocean Modelling, 157, 101731, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2020.101731

MacWilliams, M., Bever, A.J. and Foresman, E. (2016). 3-D simulations of the San Francisco Estuary with subgrid bathymetry to explore long-term trends in salinity distribution and fish abundance. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, 14(2), https://doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2016v14iss2art3

Muller-Karger, F.E., Miloslavich, P., Bax, N.J., Simmons, S., Costello, M.J., Sousa Pinto, I., Canonico, G., Turner, W., Gill, M., Montes, E., Best, B.D., Pearlman, J., Halpin, P., Dunn, D., Benson, A., Martin, C.S., Weatherdon, L.V., Appeltans, W., Provoost, P., Klein, E., Kelble, C.R., Miller, R.J., Chavez, F.P., Iken, K., Chiba, S., Obura, D., Navarro, L.M., Pereira, H.M., Allain, V., Batten, S., Benedetti-Checchi, L., Duffy, J.E., Kudela, R.M., Rebelo, L.-M., Shin, Y., Geller, G. (2018). Advancing Marine Biological Observations and Data Requirements of the Complementary Essential Ocean Variables (EOVs) and Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs) Frameworks. Frontiers in Marine Science, 5:211, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00211

Pérez, B., Brouwer, R., Beckers, J., Paradis, D., Balseiro, C., Lyons, K., Cure, M., Sotillo, M. G., Hackett, B., Verlaan, M., Alvarez-Fanjul, E. (2012). ENSURF: multi-model sea level forecast implementation and validation results for the IBIROOS and Western Mediterranean regions. Ocean Science, 8, 211-226, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-8-211-2012

Randall, D.A., Wood, R.A., Bony, S., Colman, R., Fichefet, T., Fyfe, J., Kattsov, V., Pitman, A., Shukla, J., Srinivasan, J., Stouffer, R.J., Sumicand, A.,Taylor, K.E. (2007). Climate Models and Their Evaluation. In “Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.)]”. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.

Schiller, A., Mourre, B., Drillet, Y., Brassington, G. (2018). An overview of operational oceanography. In “New Frontiers in Operational Oceanography”, E. Chassignet, A. Pascual, J. Tintoré, and J. Verron, Eds., GODAE OceanView, 1-26, https://doi.org/10.17125/gov2018.ch01

Sloyan, B.M., Wilkin, J., Hill, K.L., Chidichimo, M.P., Cronin, M.F., Johannessen, J.A., Karstensen, J., Krug, M., Lee, T., Oka, E. and Palmer, M.D. (2019). Evolving the physical global ocean observing system for research and application services through international coordination. Frontiers in Marine Science, 6, 449, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00168

Sotillo, M.G., Mourre, B., Mestres, M., Lorente, P., Aznar, R., García-León, M., Liste, M., Santana, A., Espino, M., Álvarez, E. (2021) Evaluation of the Operational CMEMS and Coastal Downstream Ocean Forecasting Services During the Storm Gloria (January 2020). Frontiers in Marine Science, 8:644525, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.644525

Su, Z., Torres, H., Klein, P., Thompson, A. F., Siegelman, L., Wang, J., Menemenlis, D., and Hill, C. (2020). High-frequency Submesoscale Motions Enhance the Upward Vertical Heat Transport in the Global Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 125(9), id. e16544, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016544

Trotta, F., Federico, I., Pinardi, N., Coppini, G., Causio, S., Jansen, E., Iovino, D. and Masina, S. (2021). A Relocatable Ocean Modeling Platform for Downscaling to Shelf-Coastal Areas to Support Disaster Risk Reduction. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8, 317, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.642815

Warner, J.C., Sherwood, C.R., Signell, R.P., Harris, C.K., and Arango, H.G. (2008). Development of a three-dimensional, regional, coupled wave, current, and sediment-transport model. Computers and Geosciences, 34(10), 1284-1306, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2008.02.012

WMOWorldMeteorologicalOrganization(2021). Definitions,requirements, andnetwork informationof ECVs (ECV-Oceanmatrix) https://public.wmo.int/en/programmes/global-climate-observing-system/essential-climate-variables.

To start contributing, sharing knowledge and editing the WIKI, please login