Chapter 3

Definition of ocean forecasting systems: temporal and spatial scales solved by marine modeling systems


CHAPTER
COORDINATORS

Enrique Alvarez Fanjul
CHAPTER
AUTHORS

Marcos Garcia Sotillo and John Wilkin

3.1 Operational oceanography and ocean forecasting services: definition and main purpose

Operational Oceanography is defined as the set of activities for the generation of products and services providing information on the marine and coastal environment. OO is designed to meet different societal, economical, scientific and other user needs. As defined by the EuroGOOS, there are two main pillars in OO services: 

  • The monitoring element, which focuses on the systematic and long-term routine measurements of oceans and atmosphere, and their rapid interpretation and dissemination.
  • The prediction component, which uses ocean models to generate a variety of products that may be nowcasts (the most accurate description of the present ocean state provided by the analyses), forecasts (the future condition of the ocean for as far ahead as possible) or hindcasts (the most complete description of past states, provided by reanalysis).

Understanding the physical behavior of ocean and coastal areas provides an important guidance to manage issues related to anthropic impacts and resource exploitation activities. A wide variety of operational ocean models have been and are currently used to tackle different issues and to support various service purposes. These different types of ocean model applications, specific for each problem to be solved, are based on different computer codes and parameterizations. They resolve a range of spatial and temporal scales (with different model resolutions) using a miscellany of data sources (as forcing initial and boundary conditions) and can rely or not on data assimilation methods to integrate observations (Schiller et al., 2018).

Wind, waves and sea-level traditionally were the most important met-ocean parameters for maritime activities due to their implications for marine safety and impacts on operations and navigation conditions. Therefore, these parameters have been the most extensively monitored and forecasted since earlier times and their forecasting has frequently been the responsibility of meteorological services. The traditionally strong connection between waves and weather prediction is reinforced by the direct interaction between waves and winds, which makes the waves a special case with specific models coupled only with atmospheric models (see Chapter 10), resulting in a separated development of ocean and wave models. Nevertheless, in the last decade the gap between ocean and wave models is diminishing and they are being progressively integrated in more comprehensive operational ocean coupled systems (in some cases also coupling with the atmosphere).

The sea level is the other key variable that counts with a long tradition in operational services based on specific models. Sea level prediction services have supported very different human activities, mostly related to navigation in shallow waters being harbors, estuaries and other coastal areas impacted by tides and appreciably sub-tidal variability. Sea level forecasting of storm surge is a key element in coastal flooding warning systems. Originally, only astronomical tidal predictions were used in the sea level forecasting but progressively this approach was augmented by the use of storm surge models, which are based on single-layer homogeneous density barotropic ocean models but include also very detailed bathymetries with astronomical tidal forcing and a meteorological residual contribution (see Chapter 7). Currently, storm surge forecasting is also benefiting from the sea surface height products delivered by the available high-resolution 3D global and regional baroclinic models operated by different ocean forecasting services (Pérez et al., 2012).

A recent overview of the current European capacity in terms of operational modeling of marine and coastal systems (Capet et al., 2020) provides a comprehensive panorama of what are the essential ocean variables and phenomena of most interest in relation to their relevance for regional environmental issues and their impact on different economic sectors. An interesting output from the survey performed to underpin this study reveals that nowadays a vast majority of the identified OO forecast services operate hydrodynamic models (see info on them in Chapter 5), with waves and biogeochemical models (see Chapters 8 and 9) also represented but to a lesser extent. Other specific models, such as for particle drift prediction and sea ice (see Chapter 6), are scarcer in the operational landscape. The study also reveals how currents, salinity, temperature, and sea surface height are resolved for almost all operational models. Instead, basic variables of biogeochemistry (e.g., oxygen, nutrients, phyto and zooplankton biomasses, suspended, and organic matter) are much less represented in the ocean forecasting services. To date, marine safety, oil spills and sea level monitoring appear as the phenomena mostly addressed by European operational models (with more than 40 implementations). Storm surges, water quality, and eutrophication are well-considered at present (~ 15-25 implementations) and will benefit from an extended coverage in the coming years (~ +30-50 % within 5 years). Finally, it must be pointed out that harmful algal blooms, shoreline/bathymetry changes, and ocean acidification receive some attention but remain limited in their coverage.

Biogeochemical models have a greater complexity, as they involve many more state variables, parameters, uncertain processes, interactions and drivers, which means that they may not have yet reached the level of maturity required for accurate simulations and useful outputs; for these reasons their adoption in operational applications is presently limited. This also applies to the use of data assimilation in coastal operational application or sea ice coupled models, even though in the past decade substantial efforts have been dedicated to developing and improving comprehensive global and regional operational forecasting services. An example is the case of the service delivered by the marine component of the Copernicus Program of the European Union (Copernicus Marine Service, 2021a) which provides free, regular and systematic information on the state of the Blue (physical including waves), White (sea ice) and Green (biogeochemical) ocean at global and regional scales, on the basis of model applications with the appropriate complexity suitable for operational forecasting. Finally, it is to be noted that sustained availability of global and regional scale core products, such as the ones delivered by Copernicus Marine Service, has fostered the development of specific “downstream” services devoted to coastal forecasting, favoring synergies between different existing services (Sotillo et al., 2021).

References

Benway, H., Lorenzoni, L., White, A., Fiedler, B., Levine, N., Nicholson, D., and DeGrandpre, M., Sosik, H., Church, M., O’Brien, T., Leinen, M., Weller, R., Karl, D., Henson, S., Letelier, R. (2019). Ocean Time Series Observations of Changing Marine Ecosystems: An Era of Integration, Synthesis, and Societal Applications. Frontiers in Marine Science, 6, 393, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00393

Capet, A., Fernández, V., She, J., Dabrowski, T., Umgiesser, G., Staneva, J., Mészáros, L., Campuzano, F., Ursella, L., Nolan, G., El Serafy, G. (2020). Operational Modeling Capacity in European Seas - An EuroGOOS Perspective and Recommendations for Improvement. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7, 129, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00129

Casulli, V. (2009). A high-resolution wetting and drying algorithm for free-surface hydrodynamics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 60(4), pp.391-408, https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.1896

Casulli, V., Zanolli, P. (2005). High resolution methods for multidimensional advection-diffusion problems in free surface hydrodynamics. Ocean Modelling, 10, 137-151, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2004.06.007

Copernicus Marine Service (2021a). EU Copernicus Marine Service, https://marine.copernicus.eu/

Copernicus Marine Service (2021b). Ocean State Report (OSR), https://marine.copernicus.eu/access-data/ocean-state-report

Copernicus Marine Service (2021c). Ocean Variables monitored by Copernicus Marine Service and Product Portfolio https://marine.copernicus.eu/access-data/ocean-monitoring-indicators

 Collins, M., Knutti, R., Arblaster, J., Dufresne, J.-L., Fichefet, T., Friedlingstein, P., Gao, X., Gutowski, W.J., Johns, T., Krinner, G., Shongwe, M., Tebaldi, C., Weaver, A.J., Wehner, M. (2013). Long-term Climate Change: Projections, Commitments and Irreversibility. In “Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]”. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. 

Dong, J., Fox-Kemper, B., Zhu, J., and Dong, C. (2021). Application of symmetric instability parameterization in the Coastal and Regional Ocean Community Model (CROCO). Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 13(3), https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002302

Fox-Kemper, B. (2018). Notions for the motions of the oceans. In “New Frontiers in Operational Oceanography”, Editors: E. P. Chassignet, A. Pascual, J. Tintoré, and J. Verron (Exeter: GODAE OceanView), 811, https://doi.org/10.17125/gov2018.ch02

Fringer, O.B., Dawson, C.N., He, R., Ralston, D.K. and Zhang, Y.J. (2019). The future of coastal and estuarine modeling: Findings from a workshop. Ocean Modelling, 143, 101458, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2019.101458

GCOS Global Climate Observing System. (2021). Essential Climate Variables https://gcos.wmo.int/en/essential-climate-variables

Giddings, S.N., Fong, D.A., Monismith, S.G., Chickadel, C.C., Edwards, K.A., Plant, W.J., Wang, B., Fringer, O.B., Horner-Devine, A.R., Jessup, A.T. (2012). Frontogenesis and frontal progression of a trapping-generated estuarine convergence front and its influence on mixing and stratification. Estuaries and Coasts, 35, 665-681, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-011-9453-z

Holt, J., Hyder, P., Ashworth, M., Harle, J., Hewitt, H. T., Liu, H., New, A. L., Pickles, S., Porter, A., Popova, E., Allen, J. I., Siddorn, J., and Wood, R. (2017). Prospects for improving the representation of coastal and shelf seas in global ocean models, Geoscientific Model Development, 10, 499-523, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-499-2017

Jacobs, G.A., D’Addezio, J.M., Bartels, B. and Spence, P.L. (2019). Constrained scales in ocean forecasting. Advances in Space Research, 68(2), 746-761, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2019.09.018

Kalra, T.S., Ganju, N.K., and Testa, J.M. (2020). Development of a submerged aquatic vegetation growth model in the Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere-Wave-Sediment Transport (COAWST v3.4) model. Geoscientific Model Development, 13(11), 5211-5228, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5211-2020

Kourafalou, V. H., De Mey, P., Staneva, J., Ayoub, N., Barth, A., Chao, Y., Cirano, M., Fiechter, J., Herzfeld, M., Kurapov, A., Moore, A. M., Oddo, P., Pullen, J., Van der Westhuysen, A., and Weisberg, R., (2015). Coastal Ocean Forecasting: science foundation and user benefits. Journal of Operational Oceanography, 8:sup1, s147-s167, https://doi.org/10.1080/1755876X.2015.1022348

Kurapov, A. L., Pelland, N. A., and Rudnick, D. L. (2017). Seasonal and interannual variability in alongslope oceanic properties off the US West Coast: Inferences from a high-resolution regional model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 122(7), 5237-5259, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC012721 

Legrand, S., Deleersnijder, E., Hanert, E., Legat, V. and Wolanski, E. (2006). High-resolution, unstructured meshes for hydrodynamic models of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 68(1-2), 36-46, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2005.08.017

Levin, J., Arango, H., Laughlin, B., Hunter, E., Wilkin, J., Moore, A. (2021), Observation Impacts on the Mid-Atlantic Bight Front and Cross-Shelf Transport in 4D-Var Ocean State Estimates, Part II – The Pioneer Array. Ocean Modelling, 157, 101731, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2020.101731

MacWilliams, M., Bever, A.J. and Foresman, E. (2016). 3-D simulations of the San Francisco Estuary with subgrid bathymetry to explore long-term trends in salinity distribution and fish abundance. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, 14(2), https://doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2016v14iss2art3

Muller-Karger, F.E., Miloslavich, P., Bax, N.J., Simmons, S., Costello, M.J., Sousa Pinto, I., Canonico, G., Turner, W., Gill, M., Montes, E., Best, B.D., Pearlman, J., Halpin, P., Dunn, D., Benson, A., Martin, C.S., Weatherdon, L.V., Appeltans, W., Provoost, P., Klein, E., Kelble, C.R., Miller, R.J., Chavez, F.P., Iken, K., Chiba, S., Obura, D., Navarro, L.M., Pereira, H.M., Allain, V., Batten, S., Benedetti-Checchi, L., Duffy, J.E., Kudela, R.M., Rebelo, L.-M., Shin, Y., Geller, G. (2018). Advancing Marine Biological Observations and Data Requirements of the Complementary Essential Ocean Variables (EOVs) and Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs) Frameworks. Frontiers in Marine Science, 5:211, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00211

Pérez, B., Brouwer, R., Beckers, J., Paradis, D., Balseiro, C., Lyons, K., Cure, M., Sotillo, M. G., Hackett, B., Verlaan, M., Alvarez-Fanjul, E. (2012). ENSURF: multi-model sea level forecast implementation and validation results for the IBIROOS and Western Mediterranean regions. Ocean Science, 8, 211-226, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-8-211-2012

Randall, D.A., Wood, R.A., Bony, S., Colman, R., Fichefet, T., Fyfe, J., Kattsov, V., Pitman, A., Shukla, J., Srinivasan, J., Stouffer, R.J., Sumicand, A.,Taylor, K.E. (2007). Climate Models and Their Evaluation. In “Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.)]”. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.

Schiller, A., Mourre, B., Drillet, Y., Brassington, G. (2018). An overview of operational oceanography. In “New Frontiers in Operational Oceanography”, E. Chassignet, A. Pascual, J. Tintoré, and J. Verron, Eds., GODAE OceanView, 1-26, https://doi.org/10.17125/gov2018.ch01

Sloyan, B.M., Wilkin, J., Hill, K.L., Chidichimo, M.P., Cronin, M.F., Johannessen, J.A., Karstensen, J., Krug, M., Lee, T., Oka, E. and Palmer, M.D. (2019). Evolving the physical global ocean observing system for research and application services through international coordination. Frontiers in Marine Science, 6, 449, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00168

Sotillo, M.G., Mourre, B., Mestres, M., Lorente, P., Aznar, R., García-León, M., Liste, M., Santana, A., Espino, M., Álvarez, E. (2021) Evaluation of the Operational CMEMS and Coastal Downstream Ocean Forecasting Services During the Storm Gloria (January 2020). Frontiers in Marine Science, 8:644525, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.644525

Su, Z., Torres, H., Klein, P., Thompson, A. F., Siegelman, L., Wang, J., Menemenlis, D., and Hill, C. (2020). High-frequency Submesoscale Motions Enhance the Upward Vertical Heat Transport in the Global Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 125(9), id. e16544, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016544

Trotta, F., Federico, I., Pinardi, N., Coppini, G., Causio, S., Jansen, E., Iovino, D. and Masina, S. (2021). A Relocatable Ocean Modeling Platform for Downscaling to Shelf-Coastal Areas to Support Disaster Risk Reduction. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8, 317, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.642815

Warner, J.C., Sherwood, C.R., Signell, R.P., Harris, C.K., and Arango, H.G. (2008). Development of a three-dimensional, regional, coupled wave, current, and sediment-transport model. Computers and Geosciences, 34(10), 1284-1306, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2008.02.012

WMOWorldMeteorologicalOrganization(2021). Definitions,requirements, andnetwork informationof ECVs (ECV-Oceanmatrix) https://public.wmo.int/en/programmes/global-climate-observing-system/essential-climate-variables.

To start contributing, sharing knowledge and editing the WIKI, please login